IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBC6.DE returned 6.48%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than LCUA.DE's 31.85% return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 32.05%
- 1Y
- 53.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | 0.35% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
LCUA.DE
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 4.49 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 16.33 | -12.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.72 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than LCUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and LCUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -33.18% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -12.13% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -21.07% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -28.54% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.86% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -12.02% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.34% | -0.42% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) is 3.71%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that IBC6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 8.54% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 17.04% | -6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 20.08% | -6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 18.48% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 19.46% | -0.15% |
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC6.DE nor LCUA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBC6.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and LCUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer