PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L).

IBC6.DE and AUAD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBC6.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia. It was launched on Jan 22, 2010. AUAD.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia NR USD. It was launched on Sep 18, 2017. Both IBC6.DE and AUAD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF		8.19%1.01%8.47%10.05%-0.95%18.21%41.17%
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis		8.88%0.65%8.37%9.49%0.66%18.16%39.23%
Different Trading Currencies

IBC6.DE is traded in EUR, while AUAD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AUAD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than AUAD.L's 8.88% return.

IBC6.DE

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.43%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
8.31%

AUAD.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.37%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis

Often compared with IBC6.DE:
IBC6.DE vs. ENZLIBC6.DE vs. VFEA.DEIBC6.DE vs. VOOIBC6.DE vs. VWCE.DEIBC6.DE vs. VTIBC6.DE vs. FLXI.DEIBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE
Often compared with AUAD.L:
AUAD.L vs. PAXJ.LAUAD.L vs. IKOR.LAUAD.L vs. KRWL.LAUAD.L vs. LCAL.LAUAD.L vs. MPXG.LAUAD.L vs. PADV.LAUAD.L vs. XKS2.L

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AUAD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis

Return for Risk

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IBC6.DE
IBC6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IBC6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
AUAD.L
AUAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IBC6.DEAUAD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.83

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.18

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

5.08

+1.73

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC6.DE and AUAD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IBC6.DEAUAD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.00

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between IBC6.DE and AUAD.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Dividend Comparison

IBC6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis		2.95%3.22%3.57%4.16%3.95%2.50%3.10%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than AUAD.L's maximum drawdown of -24.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and AUAD.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IBC6.DEAUAD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

-21.75%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-10.08%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.12%

-21.75%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-4.81%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-5.15%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.24%

-0.51%

Volatility

IBC6.DE vs. AUAD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IBC6.DEAUAD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

5.68%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

10.28%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

17.80%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

17.96%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

19.20%

+0.16%