IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and ESGP.DE (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while ESGP.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBC6.DE returned 9.64%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for ESGP.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.DE's 6.87% return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 3.96% |
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 6.87% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and ESGP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
ESGP.DE
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.83 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 5.36 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.39 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -20.50% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -6.31% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -20.50% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.57% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -5.31% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.16% | +0.76% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that IBC6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.24% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 8.68% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 11.29% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 14.54% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 14.54% | +4.77% |
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC6.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IBC6.DE and ESGP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBC6.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBC6.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer