IBB vs. UNHW
IBB (iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBB is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. IBB is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBB charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
IBB vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBB achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 27.05% return.
IBB
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
UNHW
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 27.05%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBB vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 5.61% | -0.16% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 27.05% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBB and UNHW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.20 |
IBB vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBB
UNHW
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IBB
UNHW
Basic Materials
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Communication Services
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Defensive
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Energy
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Financial Services
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Industrials
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Real Estate
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Technology
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Utilities
IBB
-
UNHW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBB vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
IBB
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBB vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBB | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBB vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBB | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.85% | -32.28% | -30.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.45% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -11.32% | -9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
IBB vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBB | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.34% | 48.61% | -28.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 48.61% | -26.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 48.61% | -25.44% |
IBB vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBB vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than UNHW's 18.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.33% | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.19% | 0.03% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBB and UNHW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBB is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBB is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 0.23% for IBB.
IBB is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBB and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for IBB and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer