IBB vs. TRUH
IBB (iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. IBB is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBB charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
IBB vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBB
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 40.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $252.83M | $308.82M | $278.87M | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
IBB vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 9.58% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBB and TRUH is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBB vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
IBB
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBB vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBB | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBB vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBB | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.85% | -4.51% | -58.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -2.75% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.06% | -1.64% | -19.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | — | — |
Volatility
IBB vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBB | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 17.62% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 17.62% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 17.62% | +5.50% |
IBB vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBB vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.22% | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.33% | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.19% | 0.03% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBB and TRUH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBB.
TRUH has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.22% for IBB.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBB and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for IBB and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer