IBB vs. PBPH
IBB (iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IBB tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBB charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
IBB vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBB achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 2.63% return.
IBB
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBB vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 5.61% | -0.45% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBB and PBPH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBB vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
IBB
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBB vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBB | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBB vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBB drawdown since its inception was -62.85%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBB and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBB | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.85% | -11.10% | -51.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.21% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -4.36% | -16.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
IBB vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBB | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.34% | 17.07% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 17.07% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 17.07% | +6.10% |
IBB vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBB has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBB vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
IBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.33% | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.19% | 0.03% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBB and PBPH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBB.
IBB has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
IBB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBB and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for IBB and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer