IBALX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
IBALX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 1, 1994. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
IBALX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBALX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBALX Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund | -4.82% | 12.69% | 14.53% | 18.44% | -16.48% | 16.65% | 15.55% | 21.33% | -3.99% | 13.84% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBALX achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBALX having a 8.68% annualized return and FASGX not far ahead at 8.70%.
IBALX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBALX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBALX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IBALX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
IBALX
FASGX
IBALX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBALX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.73 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.55 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 6.89 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBALX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.70 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.60 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBALX and FASGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IBALX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
IBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBALX Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund | 6.46% | 6.13% | 7.92% | 4.09% | 3.09% | 6.82% | 4.84% | 4.15% | 8.16% | 3.20% | 1.49% | 3.44% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
IBALX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBALX drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBALX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBALX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.33% | -47.35% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.60% | -9.07% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -23.54% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.64% | -27.20% | +3.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -7.95% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -6.74% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.04% | -0.36% |
Volatility
IBALX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund (IBALX) is 2.98%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that IBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBALX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 4.57% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.67% | 7.78% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 12.82% | -1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 12.14% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 12.56% | -1.10% |