IB1T.DE vs. GC=F
IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset.
Performance
IB1T.DE vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IB1T.DE is traded in EUR, while GC=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GC=F values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -19.19%
- YTD
- -26.48%
- 6M
- -28.36%
- 1Y
- -39.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IB1T.DE vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.48% | -15.22% |
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB1T.DE vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank
IB1T.DE
GC=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IB1T.DE vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB1T.DE | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB1T.DE vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB1T.DE | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.64% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.18% | — | — |
Volatility
IB1T.DE vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB1T.DE | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.20% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.20% | — | — |
Find the right allocation for IB1T.DE and GC=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer