IB01.L vs. EQGB.L
IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IB01.L returned 3.29%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for EQGB.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IB01.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.
Performance
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IB01.L is traded in USD, while EQGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB01.L achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's 15.85% return.
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
EQGB.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 16.22%
- YTD
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- —
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.83% | 4.34% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 1.08% | -0.85% | 0.88% | 2.06% |
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 15.85% | 28.61% | 24.02% | 62.04% | -42.01% | 26.53% | 49.89% | 29.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB01.L and EQGB.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IB01.L
EQGB.L
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB01.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +35.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 8.35 | 1.25 | +7.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 114.58 | 1.92 | +112.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 560.87 | 6.69 | +554.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and EQGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB01.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -47.56% | +46.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -14.96% | +14.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.09% | -22.21% | +22.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.12% | -47.56% | +46.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.38% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -9.44% | +9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 4.30% | -4.29% |
Volatility
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) is 0.08%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that IB01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB01.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 6.39% | -6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.22% | 15.70% | -15.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 19.67% | -19.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 24.96% | -24.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.78% | 24.73% | -23.95% |
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IB01.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IB01.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB01.L nor EQGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IB01.L and EQGB.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.
IB01.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IB01.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.
Find the right allocation for IB01.L and EQGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer