EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L).
EQGB.L and XNAQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQGB.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both EQGB.L and XNAQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQGB.L or XNAQ.L.
Key characteristics
| EQGB.L | XNAQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.69% | 10.35% |
| 1Y Return | 34.09% | 32.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.32% | 16.25% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.09 | 2.07 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.21% | 15.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.77% | -27.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.44% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQGB.L and XNAQ.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EQGB.L achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than XNAQ.L's 10.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQGB.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than XNAQ.L's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQGB.L and XNAQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQGB.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) at 6.13%. This indicates that EQGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.