IB01.L vs. CMFP.L
IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while CMFP.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IB01.L returned 3.23%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for CMFP.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. IB01.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CMFP.L.
Performance
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IB01.L is traded in USD, while CMFP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMFP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB01.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than CMFP.L's 13.99% return.
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.56% | 4.34% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 1.08% | -0.85% | 0.88% | 2.06% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 13.99% | 16.67% | 5.08% | -6.76% | 18.60% | 33.39% | 2.11% | 1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB01.L and CMFP.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IB01.L
CMFP.L
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB01.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +34.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.99 | 1.27 | +6.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 114.79 | 2.70 | +112.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 574.12 | 7.67 | +566.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum CMFP.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and CMFP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB01.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -72.10% | +70.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -8.27% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.09% | -23.04% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.15% | -23.04% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.78% | +21.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -49.88% | +49.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.92% | -2.91% |
Volatility
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) is 0.09%, while L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that IB01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB01.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 4.25% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.23% | 12.41% | -12.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 14.44% | -14.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 20.39% | -19.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 16.60% | -15.81% |
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IB01.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CMFP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IB01.L vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB01.L nor CMFP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IB01.L and CMFP.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CMFP.L.
IB01.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CMFP.L is Commodities. IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while CMFP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IB01.L and 0.30% for CMFP.L.
Find the right allocation for IB01.L and CMFP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer