CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L).

CMFP.L and VWRL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMFP.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Mar 15, 2010. VWRL.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both CMFP.L and VWRL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	15.66%	8.49%	6.86%	-11.43%	32.79%	34.61%	-0.92%	3.99%	-3.16%	-6.17%
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing	-0.33%	13.99%	19.59%	15.61%	-8.44%	20.04%	12.13%	22.03%	-4.70%	13.22%

Different Trading Currencies

CMFP.L is traded in GBp, while VWRL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMFP.L achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than VWRL.L's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CMFP.L has underperformed VWRL.L with an annualized return of 9.92%, while VWRL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.

CMFP.L

• 1D: -2.25%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 6M: 22.72%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 8.19%
• 5Y*: 14.94%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

VWRL.L

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -3.60%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 3.33%
• 1Y: 18.39%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMFP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.L's 0.22% expense ratio.

CMFP.L

L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF

VWRL.L

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing

Return for Risk

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMFP.L

CMFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
CMFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CMFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CMFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CMFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CMFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

VWRL.L

VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMFP.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.34	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.84	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.28	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	2.59	+0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.15	9.86	-3.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMFP.L and VWRL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMFP.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	1.34	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	0.82	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.86	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.89	-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between CMFP.L and VWRL.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

CMFP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing	1.39%	1.39%	1.49%	1.72%	2.03%	1.45%	1.58%	1.95%	2.22%	1.90%	1.85%	2.00%

Drawdowns

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMFP.L drawdown since its inception was -50.47%, which is greater than VWRL.L's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMFP.L and VWRL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMFP.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.47%	-24.98%	-25.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-10.11%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.51%	-17.48%	-6.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.95%	-24.98%	+1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-4.04%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.76%	-3.33%	-21.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	1.86%	+1.15%

Volatility

CMFP.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 4.51%. This indicates that CMFP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMFP.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	4.51%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	8.19%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	13.74%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.74%	12.89%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.89%	14.25%	-0.36%