IB01.L vs. AIA
IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IB01.L returned 3.23%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for AIA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IB01.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AIA.
Performance
IB01.L vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB01.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 50.12% return.
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
AIA
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- YTD
- 50.12%
- 6M
- 57.01%
- 1Y
- 90.86%
- 3Y*
- 35.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
IB01.L vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.56% | 4.34% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 1.08% | -0.85% | 0.88% | 2.06% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 50.12% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB01.L and AIA is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between IB01.L and AIA shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB01.L vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank
IB01.L
AIA
IB01.L vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB01.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +33.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.99 | 1.55 | +6.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 114.79 | 6.46 | +108.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 574.12 | 22.37 | +551.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB01.L vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and AIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB01.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -60.89% | +59.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -14.15% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.09% | -21.64% | +21.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.15% | -50.11% | +48.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.84% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -16.66% | +16.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 4.08% | -4.07% |
Volatility
IB01.L vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) is 0.09%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 14.78%. This indicates that IB01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB01.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 14.78% | -14.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.23% | 24.69% | -24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 28.13% | -27.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 26.02% | -25.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 23.82% | -23.03% |
IB01.L vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IB01.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IB01.L vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IB01.L and AIA have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AIA.
IB01.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while AIA is Asia Pacific Equities. IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while AIA tracks S&P Asia 50. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IB01.L and 0.50% for AIA.
Find the right allocation for IB01.L and AIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer