IAUM vs. METL
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. IAUM is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAUM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
IAUM vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than METL's 7.51% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.28% | 18.36% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 7.51% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and METL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
METL
IAUM vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAUM | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAUM | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum METL drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -27.39% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.85% | -18.48% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -8.24% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.98% | — | — |
Volatility
IAUM vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.57% | 44.85% | -18.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 44.85% | -26.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 44.85% | -26.93% |
IAUM vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUM vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUM and METL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
IAUM is categorized as Gold, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer