IAUM vs. GRNY
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) and GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while GRNY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs. IAUM is passively managed, while GRNY is actively managed. Over the past year, IAUM returned 30.56% vs 26.59% for GRNY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAUM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNY.
Performance
IAUM vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 9.21% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNY
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.28% | 64.27% | -2.97% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.21% | 24.05% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and GRNY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | 0.12 |
The correlation between IAUM and GRNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
GRNY
IAUM vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAUM | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.30 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 7.00 | -3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAUM | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.50 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.89 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum GRNY drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and GRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -24.18% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.02% | -11.63% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.85% | -2.59% | -17.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -4.01% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.98% | 3.81% | +4.17% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) at 5.02%. This indicates that IAUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 5.02% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.20% | 13.09% | +10.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.57% | 17.86% | +8.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 23.25% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 23.25% | -5.33% |
IAUM vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUM vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAUM nor GRNY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUM and GRNY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAUM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to GRNY (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -20.87% vs GRNY's -24.18%.
On 1-year performance, IAUM leads with 30.56% vs 26.59% for GRNY. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GRNY has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 30.56% return vs 26.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.
IAUM and GRNY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IAUM is categorized as Gold, while GRNY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tidal ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.75% for GRNY.
GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and GRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer