IAUM vs. BXSL
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, IAUM returned 29.28%/yr vs 7.49%/yr for BXSL. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IAUM vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -6.39% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -9.51%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BXSL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- 1Y
- -15.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -2.40% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | -0.49% | 1.84% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -6.39% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 32.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and BXSL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
BXSL
IAUM vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUM | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.88 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.68 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | -1.01 | +3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and BXSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -36.80% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.37% | -23.47% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.37% | -24.21% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.99% | -20.54% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -14.15% | +8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 15.73% | -7.27% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) at 5.42%. This indicates that IAUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 5.42% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.82% | 16.42% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 20.20% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 23.85% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 23.85% | -5.80% |
Dividends
IAUM vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison
IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 12.91% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUM and BXSL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAUM has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to BXSL (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -24.37% vs BXSL's -36.80%.
IAUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and BXSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer