PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUI vs. XBCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUI vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IAUI

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
1.64%
6M
4.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBCI

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and XBCI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUI vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IAUI vs. XBCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAUIXBCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

-0.63

+1.75

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum XBCI drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and XBCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIXBCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-25.99%

+9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.80%

-25.99%

+12.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-8.06%

+4.61%

Volatility

IAUI vs. XBCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUIXBCIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

67.08%

-46.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

67.08%

-46.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

67.08%

-46.77%

IAUI vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUI vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.65%, less than XBCI's 20.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
12.65%6.88%
XBCI
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
20.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUI and XBCI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAUI is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAUI is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 12.65% for IAUI.

IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XBCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.98% for XBCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUI and XBCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer