IAUI vs. XBCI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while XBCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAUI charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

IAUI vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IAUI

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -10.97%
• YTD: -8.62%
• 6M: -10.82%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBCI

• 1D: -5.86%
• 1M: -29.49%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	-12.23%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-28.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and XBCI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.36

Return for Risk

IAUI vs. XBCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUI

IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 16
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 18
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 16

XBCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUI vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IAUI	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	—	—

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, smaller than the maximum XBCI drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAUI	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-35.49%	+12.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.50%	-35.49%	+12.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-11.73%	+7.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IAUI	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.66%	67.60%	-45.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	67.60%	-46.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	67.60%	-46.35%

IAUI vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAUI vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.28%, less than XBCI's 23.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	15.28%	6.88%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	23.54%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IAUI and XBCI in my portfolio?

IAUI and XBCI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IAUI or XBCI?

On fees, IAUI is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IAUI or XBCI?

IAUI is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IAUI or XBCI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 23.54%, compared with 15.28% for IAUI.

What is the main difference between IAUI and XBCI?

IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XBCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.98% for XBCI.