PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUI vs. QQQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUI vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than QQQH's 7.91% return.


IAUI

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
1.64%
6M
4.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQH

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.93%
YTD
7.91%
6M
7.82%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
1.64%20.56%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.91%11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and QQQH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUI vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUI

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUI vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IAUI vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAUIQQQHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.79

+0.34

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and QQQH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIQQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-31.24%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.80%

-0.02%

-13.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-8.27%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

IAUI vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUIQQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

9.67%

+10.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

13.20%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

13.37%

+6.94%

IAUI vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUI vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.65%, more than QQQH's 8.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
12.65%6.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.74%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUI and QQQH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.65%, compared with 8.74% for QQQH.

IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQH is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.68% for QQQH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUI and QQQH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer