PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUI vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a -8.62% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.95% return.


IAUI

1D
-3.16%
1M
-10.97%
YTD
-8.62%
6M
-10.82%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.16%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
22.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
-8.62%20.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
15.95%16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and QQQ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUI
IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.32

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.71

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

10.01

-8.49

IAUI vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUI and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-82.97%

+60.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.50%

-11.96%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.50%

-4.66%

-17.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-32.72%

+28.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

3.23%

+3.78%

Volatility

IAUI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) is 8.26%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that IAUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

9.17%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

14.54%

+5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

17.95%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

22.69%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

22.41%

-1.16%

IAUI vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.28%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
15.28%6.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUI and QQQ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to IAUI (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUI dropped -22.50% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 32.28% vs 10.68% for IAUI. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 15.28%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUI and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer