PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAT vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAT vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IAT having a 2.80% return and SLV slightly lower at 2.78%. Over the past 10 years, IAT has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 7.95%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


IAT

1D
-1.71%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
2.80%
6M
7.09%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
7.95%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAT vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
2.80%13.05%24.36%-8.53%-20.61%38.89%-7.60%31.38%-17.45%10.42%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IAT and SLV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006

0.08

IAT vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IAT
SLV

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IAT
100.0%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

IAT

-

SLV
100.0%

Communication Services

IAT

-

SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IAT

-

SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

IAT

-

SLV

-

Energy

IAT

-

SLV

-

Healthcare

IAT

-

SLV

-

Industrials

IAT

-

SLV

-

Real Estate

IAT

-

SLV

-

Technology

IAT

-

SLV

-

Utilities

IAT

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAT vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAT
IAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAT vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IATSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.62

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

5.64

-2.26

IAT vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAT and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IATSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.89

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.58

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.49

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.25

-0.15

Drawdowns

IAT vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IATSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.22%

-76.28%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-42.45%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-42.45%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.55%

-42.45%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.55%

-42.81%

-12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.75%

-37.30%

+27.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.97%

-44.67%

+17.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.81%

19.67%

-12.86%

Volatility

IAT vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) is 6.12%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IATSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

16.30%

-10.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

58.31%

-42.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

58.90%

-37.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.03%

36.15%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.78%

31.84%

-1.06%

IAT vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAT vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
2.88%2.94%2.95%3.56%3.12%1.88%2.87%2.49%2.48%1.55%1.52%1.78%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAT and SLV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IAT (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAT dropped -77.22% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 7.95% for IAT. On fees, IAT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IAT is categorized as Financials Equities, while SLV is Silver. IAT tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAT and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer