PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IASP.L vs. XDER.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -7.66% return, which is significantly lower than XDER.L's -1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L has underperformed XDER.L with an annualized return of -0.92%, while XDER.L has yielded a comparatively higher 0.79% annualized return.


IASP.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
-7.66%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
-2.88%
5Y*
-4.60%
10Y*
-0.92%

XDER.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
-4.50%
10Y*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
-7.66%17.20%-11.78%-10.90%-4.90%2.59%-14.59%8.99%0.23%4.41%
XDER.L
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C
-1.79%11.17%-7.99%13.38%-32.92%10.39%-5.98%22.10%-7.09%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IASP.L and XDER.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2010

0.40

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IASP.L
XDER.L

Real Estate

100.0%
97.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IASP.L
100.0%
XDER.L
97.7%

Basic Materials

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Communication Services

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IASP.L

-

XDER.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Energy

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Financial Services

IASP.L

-

XDER.L
0.5%

Healthcare

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Industrials

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Technology

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Utilities

IASP.L

-

XDER.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IASP.L vs. XDER.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IASP.L
IASP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IASP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IASP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IASP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IASP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IASP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XDER.L
XDER.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDER.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDER.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDER.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XDER.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDER.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IASP.LXDER.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.01

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

-0.02

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.05

+0.78

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IASP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the XDER.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IASP.L and XDER.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IASP.LXDER.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-0.02

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

-0.21

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.04

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.31

-0.26

Drawdowns

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -57.81%, which is greater than XDER.L's maximum drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and XDER.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IASP.LXDER.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.81%

-45.20%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-16.58%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.10%

-19.16%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.75%

-45.20%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-45.20%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.67%

-27.03%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-13.36%

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

6.26%

-1.57%

Volatility

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) is 3.79%, while Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that IASP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDER.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IASP.LXDER.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

5.38%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

13.22%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

15.53%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.82%

21.06%

-9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

18.77%

-4.25%

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IASP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XDER.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IASP.L vs. XDER.L - Dividend Comparison

IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while XDER.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
XDER.L
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IASP.L and XDER.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDER.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDER.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IASP.L.

IASP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD, while XDER.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IASP.L and 0.33% for XDER.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IASP.L and XDER.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer