IASP.L vs. AREG.L
IASP.L (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) and AREG.L (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. IASP.L is passively managed, while AREG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, IASP.L returned 2.97% vs 8.87% for AREG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IASP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AREG.L.
Performance
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than AREG.L's 4.94% return.
IASP.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- -3.02%
- 5Y*
- -4.63%
- 10Y*
- -0.73%
AREG.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -7.81% | 17.20% | -8.41% |
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 4.94% | 0.47% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IASP.L and AREG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between IASP.L and AREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IASP.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IASP.L
AREG.L
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASP.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 0.93 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 2.91 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASP.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.78 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.37 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -57.81%, which is greater than AREG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and AREG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASP.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.81% | -18.47% | -39.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -9.54% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.77% | -5.08% | -30.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -5.60% | -13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 3.04% | +1.57% |
Volatility
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that IASP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IASP.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.45% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 9.16% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 11.37% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 12.41% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 12.41% | +2.12% |
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AREG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IASP.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison
IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while AREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IASP.L and AREG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AREG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AREG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IASP.L.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IASP.L and 0.40% for AREG.L.
Find the right allocation for IASP.L and AREG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer