IASH.L vs. CM5S.L
IASH.L (iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD) and CM5S.L (Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IASH.L returned 8.41%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for CM5S.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IASH.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CM5S.L.
Performance
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASH.L achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than CM5S.L's 19.27% return.
IASH.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 38.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
CM5S.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 19.27%
- 6M
- 28.14%
- 1Y
- 72.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASH.L iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD | 9.51% | 17.67% | 12.92% | -18.83% | 4.21% |
CM5S.L Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.27% | 42.07% | 14.29% | -14.04% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IASH.L and CM5S.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IASH.L and CM5S.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L — Risk / Return Rank
IASH.L
CM5S.L
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) and Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CM5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASH.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.58 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | 5.61 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 22.06 | -6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASH.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 3.58 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.68 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.39%, which is greater than CM5S.L's maximum drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASH.L and CM5S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASH.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.39% | -38.57% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -12.93% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.77% | -27.21% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -4.42% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -13.47% | -11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 3.30% | -0.86% |
Volatility
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS USD (IASH.L) is 5.69%, while Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CM5S.L) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that IASH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CM5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IASH.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 6.29% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 15.28% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 20.35% | -4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 25.04% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 25.04% | -2.25% |
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASH.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CM5S.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IASH.L vs. CM5S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IASH.L nor CM5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IASH.L and CM5S.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CM5S.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CM5S.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IASH.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IASH.L and 0.35% for CM5S.L.
Find the right allocation for IASH.L and CM5S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer