IALT vs. TLT
IALT (iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by iShares, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. IALT is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IALT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
IALT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IALT achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.
IALT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- -1.66%
IALT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 13.14% | 0.73% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.27% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IALT and TLT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IALT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IALT
TLT
IALT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IALT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.28 | 0.26 | +4.03 |
Drawdowns
IALT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IALT drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IALT and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IALT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -48.35% | +46.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -40.44% | +40.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -13.82% | +13.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.04% | — |
Volatility
IALT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IALT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.48% | 9.77% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 15.87% | -8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 14.91% | -7.43% |
IALT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IALT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IALT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IALT and TLT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IALT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.12% for IALT.
IALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while TLT is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IALT and 0.15% for TLT.
Find the right allocation for IALT and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer