IAK vs. VDC
IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAK returned 12.67%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for VDC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAK charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
IAK vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IAK has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 12.67%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
VDC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
IAK vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 10.55% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAK and VDC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IAK and VDC has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IAK vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAK
VDC
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAK
VDC
-
Healthcare
IAK
VDC
Basic Materials
IAK
-
VDC
Communication Services
IAK
-
VDC
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAK
-
VDC
Consumer Defensive
IAK
-
VDC
Energy
IAK
-
VDC
-
Industrials
IAK
-
VDC
Real Estate
IAK
-
VDC
-
Technology
IAK
-
VDC
-
Utilities
IAK
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAK vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
IAK
VDC
IAK vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAK | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.11 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.79 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 1.60 | -0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAK vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAK | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.38% | -34.24% | -43.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -9.28% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -11.78% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -16.55% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.95% | -25.31% | -19.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -4.37% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -3.73% | -12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 4.57% | -1.16% |
Volatility
IAK vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.62%. This indicates that IAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAK | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.62% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 10.02% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 12.57% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 13.17% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 14.66% | +6.26% |
IAK vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAK vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VDC's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAK and VDC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAK has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 12.67% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 12.67% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IAK.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.08% for VDC.
IAK is categorized as Financials Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IAK and 0.09% for VDC.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAK and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer