IAK vs. FTXO
IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) and FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IAK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index while FTXO tracks the NASDAQ US Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAK returned 11.77%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for FTXO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAK charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXO.
Performance
IAK vs. FTXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly lower than FTXO's 4.26% return.
IAK
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- -1.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
FTXO
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- —
IAK vs. FTXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | -3.44% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 4.26% | 21.32% | 29.05% | 0.05% | -17.93% | 40.53% | -12.53% | 30.11% | -21.79% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAK and FTXO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IAK and FTXO has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IAK vs. FTXO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAK
FTXO
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAK
FTXO
Healthcare
IAK
FTXO
-
Basic Materials
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Communication Services
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Consumer Defensive
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Energy
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Industrials
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Real Estate
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Technology
IAK
-
FTXO
Utilities
IAK
-
FTXO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAK vs. FTXO — Risk / Return Rank
IAK
FTXO
IAK vs. FTXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAK | FTXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.74 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 4.82 | -5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAK | FTXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 1.38 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.23 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IAK vs. FTXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than FTXO's maximum drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and FTXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAK | FTXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.38% | -55.26% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -16.69% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -25.84% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -46.55% | +31.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -4.95% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.13% | -15.87% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 6.02% | -2.36% |
Volatility
IAK vs. FTXO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) is 4.00%, while First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that IAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAK | FTXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 6.52% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 15.81% | -5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 21.02% | -6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 27.05% | -8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 30.00% | -9.11% |
IAK vs. FTXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAK vs. FTXO - Dividend Comparison
IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than FTXO's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.18% | 3.20% | 2.94% | 1.64% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 3.51% | 1.09% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.72% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAK and FTXO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXO has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to IAK (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs FTXO's -55.26%.
On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 11.77% vs 6.06% for FTXO. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXO.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.72% for FTXO.
IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IAK and 0.60% for FTXO.
FTXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAK and FTXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer