PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAK vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAK vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IAK has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 11.66%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


IAK

1D
-0.88%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-4.56%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-4.16%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.66%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAK vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
-4.56%9.50%28.25%11.28%11.33%26.84%-2.86%25.94%-11.48%14.18%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IAK and ACWI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between IAK and ACWI has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IAK vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IAK
ACWI

Financial Services

99.5%
16.1%

Healthcare

0.5%
8.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

IAK
99.5%
ACWI
16.1%

Healthcare

IAK
0.5%
ACWI
8.1%

Basic Materials

IAK

-

ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

IAK

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IAK

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IAK

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

IAK

-

ACWI
4.2%

Industrials

IAK

-

ACWI
10.9%

Real Estate

IAK

-

ACWI
1.8%

Technology

IAK

-

ACWI
29.4%

Utilities

IAK

-

ACWI
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAK vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAK vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAKACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.41

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

3.01

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

13.53

-14.67

IAK vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAK Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAK and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAKACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

2.29

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.71

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.75

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.43

-0.17

Drawdowns

IAK vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAKACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.38%

-56.00%

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-9.73%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-16.55%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-26.42%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.95%

-33.53%

-11.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-0.83%

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.13%

-8.61%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

2.16%

+1.80%

Volatility

IAK vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAKACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.93%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

10.29%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

12.78%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

16.05%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

17.11%

+3.78%

IAK vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAK vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.76%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAK and ACWI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IAK (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 11.66% for IAK. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IAK.

IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

IAK is categorized as Financials Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IAK and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAK and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer