IAK vs. ACWI
IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAK returned 13.24%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for ACWI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAK charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IAK vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 9.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IAK having a 13.24% annualized return and ACWI not far behind at 13.07%.
IAK
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
IAK vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 3.98% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 9.71% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAK and ACWI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IAK and ACWI has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IAK vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAK
ACWI
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IAK
ACWI
Healthcare
IAK
ACWI
Basic Materials
IAK
-
ACWI
Communication Services
IAK
-
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
IAK
-
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
IAK
-
ACWI
Energy
IAK
-
ACWI
Industrials
IAK
-
ACWI
Real Estate
IAK
-
ACWI
Technology
IAK
-
ACWI
Utilities
IAK
-
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAK vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IAK
ACWI
IAK vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.46 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 10.66 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAK vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.38% | -56.00% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -9.73% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -16.55% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -26.42% | +11.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.95% | -33.53% | -11.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.96% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -8.59% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.24% | +1.17% |
Volatility
IAK vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAK | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 5.57% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 11.35% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 13.62% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 16.19% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 17.07% | +3.80% |
IAK vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAK has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAK vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than ACWI's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.57% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAK and ACWI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAK has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to ACWI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 13.24% vs 13.07% for ACWI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IAK.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.46% for ACWI.
IAK is categorized as Financials Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IAK and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAK and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer