IAG vs. MBS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS).

MBS is an actively managed fund by Angel Oak. It was launched on Jun 4, 2021.

Performance

IAG vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IAG vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	14.13%	219.57%	100.78%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.29%	8.13%	5.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than MBS's 0.29% return.

IAG

• 1D: 7.54%
• 1M: -23.40%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 6M: 45.55%
• 1Y: 201.12%
• 3Y*: 90.79%
• 5Y*: 43.07%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

MBS

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 5.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IAG vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG

IAG Risk / Return Rank: 95
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 77
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IAG	MBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	1.51	+1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.06	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.29	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	2.36	+3.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.44	6.59	+10.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IAG vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and MBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IAG	MBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23	1.51	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	1.66	-1.54

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and MBS is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IAG vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%.

	TTM	2025	2024
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.47%	5.28%	4.52%

Drawdowns

IAG vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAG	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.55%	-4.09%	-91.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.60%	-2.54%	-32.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.40%	-1.79%	-21.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.44%	-0.99%	-55.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.42%	0.91%	+10.51%

Volatility

IAG vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 1.01%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAG	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.42%	1.01%	+19.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.69%	2.02%	+46.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.70%	3.62%	+59.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.89%	4.08%	+55.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	4.08%	+55.06%