PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAG.L vs. GFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAG.L vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAG.L is traded in GBp, while GFI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG.L achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG.L has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 7.47%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 29.51% annualized return.


IAG.L

1D
0.26%
1M
15.08%
YTD
1.69%
6M
9.43%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
40.77%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
7.47%

GFI

1D
3.11%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
-7.41%
6M
-3.94%
1Y
64.06%
3Y*
36.70%
5Y*
33.61%
10Y*
29.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAG.L vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAG.L
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A
1.69%40.88%97.53%25.16%-13.08%-10.84%-56.33%21.33%0.70%55.74%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-7.41%216.17%-4.63%37.66%8.97%24.50%38.82%82.26%-11.81%32.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IAG.L and GFI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

-0.02

The correlation between IAG.L and GFI shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (10 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAG.L:

£21.00B

GFI:

$34.99B

EPS

IAG.L:

£0.98

GFI:

$5.39

PE Ratio

IAG.L:

4.29

GFI:

7.26

PEG Ratio

IAG.L:

0.04

GFI:

0.12

PS Ratio

IAG.L:

0.48

GFI:

2.51

PB Ratio

IAG.L:

2.76

GFI:

4.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAG.L:

£42.52B

GFI:

$13.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAG.L:

£9.71B

GFI:

$7.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

IAG.L:

£8.77B

GFI:

$8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAG.L vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG.L
IAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG.L vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAG.LGFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.85

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

4.55

-1.53

IAG.L vs. GFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG.L and GFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAG.LGFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.13

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.68

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.55

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.18

-0.03

Drawdowns

IAG.L vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG.L drawdown since its inception was -86.39%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -87.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG.L and GFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAG.LGFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.39%

-87.49%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-34.76%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.74%

-34.76%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.20%

-47.77%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.84%

-63.13%

-13.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.87%

-32.66%

+24.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-39.91%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.57%

14.11%

-4.54%

Volatility

IAG.L vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) is 13.52%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that IAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAG.LGFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.52%

17.16%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.19%

43.42%

-15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.96%

57.08%

-21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

49.99%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.30%

53.54%

-8.24%

Dividends

IAG.L vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

IAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than GFI's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
4.71%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%
IAG.L
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A
2.22%2.25%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.64%13.78%6.12%5.01%6.21%2.14%

Financials

IAG.L vs. GFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
17.28B
5.29B
(IAG.L) Total Revenue
(GFI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IAG.L values in GBp, GFI values in USD

IAG.L vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A and Gold Fields Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
24.0%
56.7%
Portfolio components
IAG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 17.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

IAG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

IAG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 17.28B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IAG.L and GFI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAG.L and GFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer