PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAAAX vs. EWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAAAX vs. EWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAAAX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than EWC's 8.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IAAAX having a 11.15% annualized return and EWC not far ahead at 11.19%.


IAAAX

1D
0.16%
1M
5.48%
YTD
10.35%
6M
11.52%
1Y
26.56%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
11.15%

EWC

1D
-1.38%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.73%
6M
12.75%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAAAX vs. EWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
10.35%21.45%17.37%20.04%-19.24%16.14%18.87%21.75%-11.48%20.17%
EWC
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
8.73%35.92%12.38%14.73%-12.95%26.98%5.52%27.58%-17.16%15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IAAAX and EWC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2002

0.72

The correlation between IAAAX and EWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAAAX vs. EWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAAAX
IAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EWC
EWC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAAAX vs. EWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAAAXEWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.70

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

15.25

-2.87

IAAAX vs. EWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the EWC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAAAX and EWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAAAXEWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.24

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.60

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

IAAAX vs. EWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAAAX drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum EWC drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAAAX and EWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAAAXEWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-60.75%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-8.51%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-12.97%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-24.81%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.34%

-42.66%

+7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.38%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-13.14%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.06%

+0.13%

Volatility

IAAAX vs. EWC - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAAAXEWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.46%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

11.03%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

14.04%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

17.25%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

18.74%

-1.89%

IAAAX vs. EWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAAAX and EWC have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

IAAAX vs. EWC - Dividend Comparison

IAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than EWC's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWC
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
1.33%1.45%2.23%2.27%2.34%1.85%2.09%2.16%2.65%1.97%1.75%2.34%
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
6.54%7.21%5.16%2.79%8.74%8.25%4.13%9.02%19.05%11.01%8.16%9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAAAX and EWC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWC has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to IAAAX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAAAX dropped -56.57% vs EWC's -60.75%.

EWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAAAX and EWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer