IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L
IAAA.L (iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS) and XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IAAA.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XDEQ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAAA.L returned -0.45%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for XDEQ.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAAA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEQ.L.
Performance
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IAAA.L is traded in USD, while XDEQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAAA.L achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.L's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IAAA.L has underperformed XDEQ.L with an annualized return of -0.45%, while XDEQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.
IAAA.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 1.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.45%
XDEQ.L
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAAA.L iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS | -0.44% | 10.35% | -5.03% | 8.23% | -20.86% | -8.08% | 11.86% | 4.97% | -2.93% | 9.71% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 7.17% | 15.63% | 16.92% | 25.51% | -19.12% | 24.01% | 14.38% | 31.06% | -7.86% | 23.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAAA.L and XDEQ.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2014 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, IAAA.L and XDEQ.L have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
IAAA.L
XDEQ.L
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAAA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 2.22 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 9.46 | -8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAAA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 1.77 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.49 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.58 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.20 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, smaller than the maximum XDEQ.L drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAAA.L and XDEQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAAA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.79% | -47.19% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.04% | -8.79% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.30% | -19.13% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.57% | -28.33% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.79% | -32.05% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.89% | -1.10% | -16.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -16.44% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.07% | -0.12% |
Volatility
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) have volatilities of 2.48% and 2.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAAA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 2.41% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.62% | 8.43% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.16% | 11.02% | -3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.88% | 20.49% | -11.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.68% | 21.26% | -13.58% |
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAAA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
IAAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while XDEQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAAA.L iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS | 2.71% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.52% | 0.75% | 0.48% | 0.56% | 0.88% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.88% | 1.08% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAAA.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAAA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAAA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
IAAA.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while XDEQ.L is Global Equities. IAAA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IAAA.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
Find the right allocation for IAAA.L and XDEQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer