PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IAAA.L vs. LQD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IAAA.LLQD
YTD Return-2.46%2.98%
1Y Return6.39%12.92%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.59%-3.03%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.72%0.61%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.14%2.62%
Sharpe Ratio0.871.55
Sortino Ratio1.332.28
Omega Ratio1.161.27
Calmar Ratio0.250.60
Martin Ratio1.815.59
Ulcer Index3.98%2.11%
Daily Std Dev8.31%7.61%
Max Drawdown-32.79%-24.95%
Current Drawdown-23.23%-9.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between IAAA.L and LQD is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

IAAA.L vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IAAA.L achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IAAA.L has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of -1.14%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.62% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.61%
5.60%
IAAA.L
LQD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAAA.L vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
Expense ratio chart for IAAA.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for LQD: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAAA.L vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAAA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.88
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.15
LQD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQD, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LQD, currently valued at 4.85, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.85

IAAA.L vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAAA.L and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.58
1.41
IAAA.L
LQD

Dividends

IAAA.L vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

IAAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than LQD's 4.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
2.31%1.52%0.75%0.48%0.56%0.88%0.94%0.77%0.88%1.08%1.38%1.02%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.34%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%3.83%

Drawdowns

IAAA.L vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAAA.L and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-23.23%
-9.30%
IAAA.L
LQD

Volatility

IAAA.L vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) is 1.94%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that IAAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.94%
2.50%
IAAA.L
LQD