PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IAAA.LLQDA.L
YTD Return1.79%5.44%
1Y Return11.41%13.92%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.37%-2.24%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.11%1.04%
Sharpe Ratio1.231.56
Daily Std Dev8.78%8.52%
Max Drawdown-32.79%-25.10%
Current Drawdown-19.88%-7.05%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between IAAA.L and LQDA.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IAAA.L achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA.L's 5.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.74%
7.34%
IAAA.L
LQDA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAAA.L and LQDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
Expense ratio chart for IAAA.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for LQDA.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) and iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAAA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.88
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IAAA.L, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.83
LQDA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDA.L, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDA.L, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDA.L, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDA.L, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDA.L, currently valued at 6.34, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.34

IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which roughly equals the LQDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IAAA.L and LQDA.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.23
1.56
IAAA.L
LQDA.L

Dividends

IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IAAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while LQDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS
1.93%1.52%0.75%0.48%0.56%0.88%0.94%0.77%0.88%1.08%1.38%1.02%
LQDA.L
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, which is greater than LQDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAAA.L and LQDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-19.88%
-7.05%
IAAA.L
LQDA.L

Volatility

IAAA.L vs. LQDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS (IAAA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) at 1.55%. This indicates that IAAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.97%
1.55%
IAAA.L
LQDA.L