PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HZEN vs. ETCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HZEN vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HZEN achieves a -35.16% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -38.79% return.


HZEN

1D
7.64%
1M
-14.57%
YTD
-35.16%
6M
-42.74%
1Y
-6.95%
3Y*
-15.44%
5Y*
10Y*

ETCG

1D
-3.83%
1M
-8.63%
YTD
-38.79%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
-51.29%
3Y*
-19.29%
5Y*
-37.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HZEN vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HZEN
Grayscale Horizen Trust
-35.16%-83.06%164.86%236.36%-93.12%-73.33%
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
-38.79%-39.78%-9.57%289.22%-80.45%-40.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HZEN and ETCG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HZEN vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HZEN
HZEN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HZEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HZEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HZEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HZEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HZEN Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ETCG
ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HZEN vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HZENETCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.86

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

-0.75

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

-1.10

+0.97

HZEN vs. ETCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HZEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the ETCG Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HZEN and ETCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HZEN vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HZEN drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HZEN and ETCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HZENETCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-96.59%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.69%

-68.71%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.24%

-79.59%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.21%

-95.57%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.97%

-82.73%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.39%

46.80%

+9.59%

Volatility

HZEN vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Horizen Trust (HZEN) has a higher volatility of 37.94% compared to Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) at 12.88%. This indicates that HZEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HZENETCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.94%

12.88%

+25.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.48%

36.86%

+41.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.07%

62.36%

+76.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.03%

92.24%

+57.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.03%

114.90%

+35.13%

Dividends

HZEN vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison

Neither HZEN nor ETCG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HZEN and ETCG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HZEN has higher volatility (37.94%) compared to ETCG (12.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HZEN dropped -98.73% vs ETCG's -96.59%.

On 3-year performance, HZEN leads with -15.44% vs -19.29% for ETCG. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 12.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HZEN has performed better with a -15.44% return vs -19.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HZEN and ETCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

HZEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HZEN and ETCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer