PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYZD vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYZD vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYZD achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HYZD has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 5.60%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.


HYZD

1D
0.35%
1M
0.87%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.60%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
5.60%

DGRW

1D
0.71%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYZD vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
2.88%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%6.27%-0.63%9.17%-2.21%6.32%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.87%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HYZD and DGRW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2013

0.40

The correlation between HYZD and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYZD vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYZD
DGRW

Energy

100.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.7%

Financial Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

12.8%

Industrials

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

32.1%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Energy

HYZD
100.0%
DGRW
5.0%

Basic Materials

HYZD

-

DGRW
3.3%

Communication Services

HYZD

-

DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HYZD

-

DGRW
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

HYZD

-

DGRW
6.7%

Financial Services

HYZD

-

DGRW
11.3%

Healthcare

HYZD

-

DGRW
12.8%

Industrials

HYZD

-

DGRW
9.9%

Real Estate

HYZD

-

DGRW

-

Technology

HYZD

-

DGRW
32.1%

Utilities

HYZD

-

DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYZD vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYZD vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYZDDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.41

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

2.64

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

11.58

+5.89

HYZD vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYZD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYZD and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYZDDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.22

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.89

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.86

-0.35

Drawdowns

HYZD vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYZD drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYZD and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYZDDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-32.04%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-8.30%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-16.21%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

-17.27%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

-32.04%

+6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-3.01%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

1.89%

-1.44%

Volatility

HYZD vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) is 1.00%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that HYZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYZDDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

2.49%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

7.67%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

9.89%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

13.97%

-7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

16.21%

-7.64%

HYZD vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYZD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYZD vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

HYZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.87%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYZD and DGRW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to HYZD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYZD dropped -25.66% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.19% vs 5.60% for HYZD. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, HYZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.19% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

HYZD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while DGRW is Dividend. HYZD tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HYZD and 0.28% for DGRW.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYZD and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer