HYUP vs. MIDE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE).

HYUP and MIDE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYUP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2018. MIDE is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. Both HYUP and MIDE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HYUP vs. MIDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HYUP vs. MIDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF	-0.43%	8.83%	10.30%	14.56%	-13.30%	4.07%
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	1.75%	9.81%	11.21%	15.20%	-11.63%	11.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYUP achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than MIDE's 1.75% return.

HYUP

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 7.65%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: —

MIDE

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -5.36%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 5.05%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 11.64%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYUP vs. MIDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MIDE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

HYUP

Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF

Return for Risk

HYUP vs. MIDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYUP

HYUP Risk / Return Rank: 72
HYUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
HYUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HYUP Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HYUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
HYUP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

MIDE

MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 51
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYUP vs. MIDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYUP	MIDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.88	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.36	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.19	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	1.30	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	5.42	+2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYUP vs. MIDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the MIDE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYUP and MIDE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYUP	MIDE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	0.88	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.33	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.36	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between HYUP and MIDE is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HYUP vs. MIDE - Dividend Comparison

HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than MIDE's 1.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF	7.37%	7.44%	7.78%	7.48%	7.15%	6.19%	6.89%	6.77%	6.98%
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	1.48%	1.52%	1.45%	1.36%	1.33%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HYUP vs. MIDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYUP drawdown since its inception was -24.79%, roughly equal to the maximum MIDE drawdown of -24.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUP and MIDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYUP	MIDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.79%	-24.59%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.65%	-14.54%	+9.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.06%	-24.59%	+6.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-6.73%	+4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-6.67%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	3.48%	-2.52%

Volatility

HYUP vs. MIDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) is 2.38%, while Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that HYUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYUP	MIDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	6.31%	-3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.24%	11.89%	-8.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.39%	21.22%	-14.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.25%	19.69%	-11.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.83%	19.80%	-9.97%