PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYUP vs. ASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYUP vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYUP

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*

ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYUP vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.63%8.83%10.30%14.56%-13.30%5.13%5.73%16.54%-3.90%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-30.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HYUP and ASHX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.27

The correlation between HYUP and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYUP vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYUP
HYUP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HYUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYUP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYUP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYUP vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYUPASHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

HYUP vs. ASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYUPASHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

HYUP vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYUPASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

Volatility

HYUP vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYUPASHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.75%

HYUP vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYUP vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
7.33%7.44%7.78%7.48%7.15%6.19%6.89%6.77%6.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYUP and ASHX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYUP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYUP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.

HYUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

HYUP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ASHX is China Equities. HYUP tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index, while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYUP and 0.60% for ASHX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYUP and ASHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer