HYUP vs. ASHX
HYUP (Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYUP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index, while ASHX is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYUP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASHX.
Performance
HYUP vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYUP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYUP vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 1.63% | 8.83% | 10.30% | 14.56% | -13.30% | 5.13% | 5.73% | 16.54% | -3.90% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -30.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYUP and ASHX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.27 |
The correlation between HYUP and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYUP vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank
HYUP
ASHX
HYUP vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYUP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYUP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HYUP vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYUP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility
HYUP vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYUP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.75% | — | — |
HYUP vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYUP vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison
HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 7.33% | 7.44% | 7.78% | 7.48% | 7.15% | 6.19% | 6.89% | 6.77% | 6.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYUP and ASHX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYUP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYUP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.
HYUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.
HYUP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ASHX is China Equities. HYUP tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index, while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYUP and 0.60% for ASHX.
Find the right allocation for HYUP and ASHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer