HYTR vs. MTBA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HYTR (CP High Yield Trend ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYTR is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the CP High Yield Trend Index, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. HYTR is passively managed, while MTBA is actively managed. Over the past year, HYTR returned 5.23% vs 4.76% for MTBA. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYTR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.

Performance

HYTR vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.13% return.

HYTR

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 6.52%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: —

MTBA

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTR vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF	0.35%	5.95%	7.25%	5.30%
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	-0.13%	7.74%	1.99%	3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HYTR and MTBA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.56

The correlation between HYTR and MTBA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYTR vs. MTBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYTR	MTBA
Energy	90.3%	-
Technology	9.3%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	47.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HYTR vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTR

HYTR Risk / Return Rank: 44
HYTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HYTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
HYTR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HYTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
HYTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

MTBA

MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 42
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 48
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTR vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYTR	MTBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.56	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.20	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	1.69	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	5.74	+1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYTR vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTR and MTBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYTR	MTBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.56	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	1.31	-1.01

Drawdowns

HYTR vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and MTBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYTR	MTBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-3.48%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.28%	-2.82%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-1.50%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-0.79%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	0.83%	-0.14%

Volatility

HYTR vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is 1.09%, while Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that HYTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYTR	MTBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	1.33%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	2.47%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	3.10%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.62%	3.95%	+1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.86%	3.95%	+1.91%

HYTR vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYTR vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF	5.70%	5.78%	5.55%	5.43%	1.24%	3.70%	3.05%
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	6.08%	5.98%	6.03%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYTR and MTBA in my portfolio?

HYTR and MTBA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYTR or MTBA?

MTBA has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to HYTR (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs MTBA's -3.48%.

Which ETF is better, HYTR or MTBA?

On 1-year performance, HYTR leads with 5.23% vs 4.76% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYTR or MTBA?

Over the 1-year period, HYTR has performed better with a 5.23% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYTR or MTBA?

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HYTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYTR or MTBA?

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 5.70% for HYTR.

What is the main difference between HYTR and MTBA?

HYTR is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 0.15% for MTBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.