PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTR vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTR vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 26.03% return.


HYTR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.72%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*

ENFR

1D
1.15%
1M
0.77%
YTD
26.03%
6M
24.35%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTR vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
0.35%5.95%7.25%8.31%-11.29%2.75%-0.95%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
26.03%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-23.92%

Correlation

The correlation between HYTR and ENFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.31

The correlation between HYTR and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYTR vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYTR
ENFR

Energy

90.3%
98.8%

Technology

9.3%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Energy

HYTR
90.3%
ENFR
98.8%

Technology

HYTR
9.3%
ENFR

-

Real Estate

HYTR
0.5%
ENFR

-

Basic Materials

HYTR

-

ENFR

-

Communication Services

HYTR

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYTR

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

HYTR

-

ENFR

-

Financial Services

HYTR

-

ENFR
0.2%

Healthcare

HYTR

-

ENFR

-

Industrials

HYTR

-

ENFR
3.4%

Utilities

HYTR

-

ENFR
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTR vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTR
HYTR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HYTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTR vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYTRENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.32

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

9.04

-1.42

HYTR vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTR and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYTRENFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.97

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

1.05

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.35

-0.05

Drawdowns

HYTR vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTRENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-68.28%

+55.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-8.64%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

-15.58%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.25%

-20.29%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-3.86%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-15.98%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

3.17%

-2.48%

Volatility

HYTR vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is 1.09%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that HYTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTRENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

6.25%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

11.42%

-8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

14.65%

-10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

19.30%

-13.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.86%

24.68%

-18.82%

HYTR vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTR vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than ENFR's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.98%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
5.70%5.78%5.55%5.43%1.24%3.70%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYTR and ENFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENFR has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to HYTR (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 20.19% vs 2.09% for HYTR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HYTR.

HYTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.

HYTR is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ENFR is Energy Equities. HYTR tracks CP High Yield Trend Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTR and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer