PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYT vs. RQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYT vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYT achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 18.57% return. Over the past 10 years, HYT has underperformed RQI with an annualized return of 7.43%, while RQI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.


HYT

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.45%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
-2.23%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
7.43%

RQI

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
18.57%
6M
20.22%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
8.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYT vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYT
BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund
1.45%0.06%14.43%19.92%-22.58%16.62%11.55%31.19%-7.81%8.99%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
18.57%2.07%8.04%15.74%-31.07%56.64%-9.28%54.62%-11.11%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HYT and RQI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2003

0.41

The correlation between HYT and RQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYT vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYT
HYT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYT vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYTRQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.17

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

1.27

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

3.75

-4.27

HYT vs. RQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYT and RQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYT vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYT drawdown since its inception was -56.95%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYT and RQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTRQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.95%

-91.59%

+34.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-11.74%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

-22.43%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.05%

-41.06%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.59%

-59.12%

+16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-3.41%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-17.91%

+12.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

3.98%

+0.25%

Volatility

HYT vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) is 2.62%, while Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that HYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTRQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

6.15%

-3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

12.42%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

15.58%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

23.03%

-8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

26.96%

-10.03%

HYT vs. RQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYT has a 2.83% expense ratio, which is higher than RQI's 2.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYT vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

HYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, more than RQI's 8.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYT
BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund
10.84%10.50%9.53%9.91%9.80%7.58%8.18%7.92%9.20%7.68%8.23%10.18%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
8.86%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYT and RQI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQI has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to HYT (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYT dropped -56.95% vs RQI's -91.59%.

RQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYT and RQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer