HYPG vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

HYPG (Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYPG is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Grayscale, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

HYPG vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF (HYPG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HYPG

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -8.45%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 56.02%
• 6M: 50.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYPG vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HYPG Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF	-8.85%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	-17.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HYPG and CIFU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

HYPG vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF (HYPG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

HYPG vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYPG drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYPG and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYPG	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.56%	-77.20%	+50.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.91%	-28.16%	+19.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.29%	-42.40%	+30.11%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HYPG	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.96%	205.28%	-95.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.96%	205.28%	-95.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.96%	205.28%	-95.32%

Dividends

HYPG vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYPG nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYPG and CIFU in my portfolio?

HYPG and CIFU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYPG or CIFU?

HYPG and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between HYPG and CIFU?

HYPG is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and REX.