HYP vs. KOKU
HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) and KOKU (Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HYP is actively managed, while KOKU is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for KOKU.
Performance
HYP vs. KOKU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 26.28% return, which is significantly higher than KOKU's 7.82% return.
HYP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 26.28%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOKU
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- —
HYP vs. KOKU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 26.28% | -6.61% |
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 7.82% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYP and KOKU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYP vs. KOKU — Risk / Return Rank
HYP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KOKU
HYP vs. KOKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYP | KOKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYP vs. KOKU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum KOKU drawdown of -25.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and KOKU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYP | KOKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -25.77% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -2.51% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -4.80% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility
HYP vs. KOKU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYP | KOKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.24% | 12.55% | +30.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 16.50% | +26.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 16.83% | +26.41% |
HYP vs. KOKU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KOKU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYP vs. KOKU - Dividend Comparison
HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than KOKU's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYP and KOKU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.11% for HYP.
They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.09% for KOKU.
Find the right allocation for HYP and KOKU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer