HYP vs. JQUA

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HYP is actively managed, while JQUA is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.

Performance

HYP vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than JQUA's 10.93% return.

HYP

• 1D: -9.65%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JQUA

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYP vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	20.07%	-5.01%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	10.93%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HYP and JQUA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

HYP vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA

JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 54
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYP vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYP	JQUA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.81	-0.32

Drawdowns

HYP vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and JQUA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYP	JQUA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.58%	-32.92%	+13.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.65%	-3.09%	-7.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-4.16%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HYP	JQUA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.45%	11.57%	+30.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.45%	15.66%	+26.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.45%	18.01%	+24.44%

HYP vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYP vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than JQUA's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.11%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.10%	1.19%	1.24%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%	1.44%	1.67%	2.10%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYP and JQUA in my portfolio?

HYP and JQUA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HYP or JQUA?

On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYP or JQUA?

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYP or JQUA?

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.11% for HYP.

What is the main difference between HYP and JQUA?

They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.12% for JQUA.