PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYP vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYP vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 23.84% return.


HYP

1D
-3.79%
1M
-5.92%
6M
5.10%
YTD
19.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
-2.12%
1M
-3.95%
6M
15.38%
YTD
23.84%
1Y
51.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYP vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYP and FMTM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYP vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYP vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYPFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

HYP vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYP vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYPFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-12.12%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.70%

-8.80%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-2.03%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

Volatility

HYP vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYPFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.42%

25.79%

+18.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.42%

24.51%

+19.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.42%

24.51%

+19.91%

HYP vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYP vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FMTM's 0.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HYP and FMTM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.11% for HYP.

HYP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.45% for FMTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYP and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer