PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYP vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYP vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HYP having a 32.89% return and FMTM slightly lower at 31.40%.


HYP

1D
1.19%
1M
6.48%
YTD
32.89%
6M
28.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.57%
YTD
31.40%
6M
33.68%
1Y
63.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYP vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYP and FMTM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYP vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYP

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYP vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HYP vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYPFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

2.36

-1.38

Drawdowns

HYP vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYPFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-12.12%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.26%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-1.88%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

Volatility

HYP vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYPFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.91%

22.83%

+18.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.91%

22.91%

+18.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.91%

22.91%

+18.00%

HYP vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYP vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FMTM's 0.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HYP and FMTM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.

HYP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.45% for FMTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYP and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer