HYMU vs. CGHM
HYMU (BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF) and CGHM (Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. HYMU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CGHM.
Performance
HYMU vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMU vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF | 0.00% |
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 0.52% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMU vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank
HYMU
CGHM
HYMU vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYMU | CGHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.16 | — |
Drawdowns
HYMU vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMU drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CGHM drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMU and CGHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMU | CGHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.90% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.24% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility
HYMU vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMU | CGHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 3.12% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.52% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.52% | -4.52% |
HYMU vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYMU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYMU vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison
HYMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 3.80% | 3.61% | 1.78% |
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMU.
CGHM has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.00% for HYMU.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMU and 0.34% for CGHM.
Find the right allocation for HYMU and CGHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer