HYMC vs. TYGO
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) and TYGO (Tigo Energy Inc.) are both stocks. HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TYGO operates in Solar (Technology). Over the past 3 years, HYMC returned 98.71%/yr vs -43.32%/yr for TYGO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYMC vs. TYGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than TYGO's 107.97% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -40.96%
- YTD
- 8.37%
- 6M
- 92.24%
- 1Y
- 657.65%
- 3Y*
- 98.71%
- 5Y*
- -6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
TYGO
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -25.84%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 81.65%
- 1Y
- 133.33%
- 3Y*
- -43.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMC vs. TYGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 8.37% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -67.01% |
TYGO Tigo Energy Inc. | 107.97% | 40.12% | -52.88% | -79.51% | 3.03% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and TYGO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between HYMC and TYGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HYMC:
$2.31B
TYGO:
$208.30M
HYMC:
-$1.64
TYGO:
$0.05
HYMC:
10.33
TYGO:
5.10
HYMC:
$0.00
TYGO:
$109.89M
HYMC:
-$4.65M
TYGO:
$47.97M
HYMC:
-$69.17M
TYGO:
$12.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. TYGO — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
TYGO
HYMC vs. TYGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Tigo Energy Inc. (TYGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYMC | TYGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.27 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.29 | 2.70 | +8.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 6.25 | +23.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. TYGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum TYGO drawdown of -97.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and TYGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | TYGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -97.45% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.77% | -49.64% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -97.45% | +34.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.72% | -89.07% | +5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.36% | -55.49% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.95% | 21.42% | +0.53% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. TYGO - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 24.71% compared to Tigo Energy Inc. (TYGO) at 17.85%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | TYGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.71% | 17.85% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 95.63% | 77.62% | +18.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.00% | 101.13% | +18.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.60% | 92.03% | +60.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.97% | 92.03% | +30.94% |
Dividends
HYMC vs. TYGO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYMC nor TYGO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HYMC vs. TYGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Tigo Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMC and TYGO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (24.71%) compared to TYGO (17.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs TYGO's -97.45%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYMC and TYGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer