HYMC vs. ION
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) is a stock, while ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. Over the past 3 years, HYMC returned 99.37%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ION. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYMC vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than ION's -1.19% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -29.20%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 647.60%
- 3Y*
- 99.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ION
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -15.33%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 78.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMC vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -1.56% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -26.13% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | -1.19% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and ION is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
ION
HYMC vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYMC | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.31 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 2.93 | +7.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.26 | 9.15 | +17.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and ION.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -52.08% | -46.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.07% | -26.85% | -34.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -46.47% | -16.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.21% | -25.47% | -59.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -23.60% | -39.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.84% | 8.57% | +16.27% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 26.56% compared to Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) at 13.79%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.56% | 13.79% | +12.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.12% | 32.01% | +54.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.45% | 39.57% | +78.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.82% | 31.57% | +121.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.79% | 31.57% | +91.22% |
Dividends
HYMC vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.50% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMC and ION have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (26.56%) compared to ION (13.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs ION's -52.08%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYMC and ION
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer