HYMC vs. ERAS

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) and ERAS (Erasca, Inc.) are both stocks. HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ERAS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, HYMC returned -3.09%/yr vs -1.16%/yr for ERAS. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

HYMC vs. ERAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than ERAS's 407.26% return.

HYMC

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -13.94%
• 6M: -58.80%
• YTD: -14.05%
• 1Y: 470.67%
• 3Y*: 65.87%
• 5Y*: -3.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -16.83%

ERAS

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 17.86%
• 6M: 96.36%
• YTD: 407.26%
• 1Y: 984.48%
• 3Y*: 93.61%
• 5Y*: -1.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ERAS Erasca, Inc.	$108.50M	$97.60M	$80.65M
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	$30.33M	$32.98M	$62.08M

HYMC vs. ERAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	-14.05%	975.57%	-9.80%	-53.96%	-13.30%	-74.21%
ERAS Erasca, Inc.	407.26%	48.21%	17.84%	-50.58%	-72.34%	-2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMC and ERAS is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap HYMC : $1.87B ERAS : $6.55B
EPS HYMC : -$1.44 ERAS : -$0.95
PB Ratio HYMC : 8.19 ERAS : 14.59
Total Revenue (TTM) HYMC : $0.00 ERAS : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) HYMC : -$4.65M ERAS : -$743.00K
EBITDA (TTM) HYMC : -$69.17M ERAS : -$279.47M

Return for Risk

HYMC vs. ERAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 96
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ERAS

ERAS Risk / Return Rank: 99
ERAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
ERAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ERAS Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ERAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ERAS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMC vs. ERAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYMC	ERAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.97	9.47	-5.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	4.68	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.76	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.09	16.73	-9.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.95	49.01	-33.06

HYMC vs. ERAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMC Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is lower than the ERAS Sharpe Ratio of 9.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMC and ERAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYMC vs. ERAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum ERAS drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and ERAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYMC	ERAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.89%	-95.65%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.93%	-59.46%	-7.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.93%	-67.68%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.21%	-95.65%	+2.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.09%	-22.47%	-64.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.67%	-73.58%	+9.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.70%	20.41%	+9.29%

Volatility

HYMC vs. ERAS - Volatility Comparison

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) have volatilities of 24.97% and 23.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYMC	ERAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.97%	23.95%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.56%	86.49%	-7.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.66%	105.24%	+14.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	152.87%	83.43%	+69.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	122.52%	83.39%	+39.13%

Dividends

HYMC vs. ERAS - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYMC nor ERAS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYMC and ERAS in my portfolio?

HYMC and ERAS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYMC or ERAS?

HYMC has higher volatility (24.97%) compared to ERAS (23.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs ERAS's -95.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.47 vs 3.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.