HYLS vs. IBHH
HYLS (First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF) and IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYLS is actively managed, while IBHH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYLS returned 7.62%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for IBHH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYLS charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHH.
Performance
HYLS vs. IBHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLS achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than IBHH's 1.92% return.
HYLS
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
IBHH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLS vs. IBHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLS First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF | 0.40% | 8.00% | 5.85% | 13.66% | -9.07% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.92% | 8.02% | 7.53% | 12.87% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLS and IBHH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HYLS and IBHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLS vs. IBHH — Risk / Return Rank
HYLS
IBHH
HYLS vs. IBHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYLS | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 5.26 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 21.04 | -14.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYLS vs. IBHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, which is greater than IBHH's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and IBHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLS | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -12.05% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -1.22% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.96% | -4.66% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -2.28% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.31% | +0.42% |
Volatility
HYLS vs. IBHH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) at 0.72%. This indicates that HYLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLS | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.72% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 2.11% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55% | 2.82% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.62% | 7.22% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.70% | 7.22% | -0.52% |
HYLS vs. IBHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLS vs. IBHH - Dividend Comparison
HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than IBHH's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLS First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF | 6.70% | 6.38% | 6.25% | 5.98% | 7.38% | 5.48% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.81% | 5.53% | 5.37% | 6.11% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.25% | 6.39% | 6.93% | 6.65% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLS and IBHH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYLS has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to IBHH (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLS dropped -22.99% vs IBHH's -12.05%.
On 3-year performance, IBHH leads with 8.44% vs 7.62% for HYLS. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 8.44% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for HYLS.
HYLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 6.25% for IBHH.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for HYLS and 0.35% for IBHH.
IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYLS and IBHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer