PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLB vs. HYDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLB vs. HYDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than HYDW's 1.34% return.


HYLB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.70%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*

HYDW

1D
0.05%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.39%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLB vs. HYDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.73%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-2.05%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.34%8.47%5.42%9.84%-7.86%2.77%5.51%11.44%-1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLB and HYDW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.88

The correlation between HYLB and HYDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLB vs. HYDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDW
HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLB vs. HYDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYLBHYDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.44

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

11.59

-0.44

HYLB vs. HYDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the HYDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLB and HYDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYLB vs. HYDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLB drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than HYDW's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLB and HYDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLBHYDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-17.75%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-2.09%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-3.64%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

-12.68%

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.04%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-1.88%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.44%

+0.09%

Volatility

HYLB vs. HYDW - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) at 0.63%. This indicates that HYLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLBHYDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.63%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

2.28%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

2.94%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

6.41%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.16%

6.97%

+1.19%

HYLB vs. HYDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYDW's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HYLB vs. HYDW - Dividend Comparison

HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than HYDW's 5.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
5.73%5.75%5.35%5.69%4.78%3.30%4.45%4.56%4.42%0.00%0.00%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.47%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLB and HYDW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYLB has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to HYDW (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLB dropped -22.91% vs HYDW's -17.75%.

On 5-year performance, HYLB leads with 3.92% vs 3.50% for HYDW. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYDW has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 3.92% return vs 3.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HYDW.

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 5.73% for HYDW.

HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index, while HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HYLB and 0.20% for HYDW.

HYDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLB and HYDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer